On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:57:37 +0100 Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> wrote:> I presume this produces the same effect:> > case "$device" in> /dev/mmcblk0rpmb | /dev/mmcblk0boot? ) continue ;;> esac> > (which has the benefit of needing no forks)> > BTW How sure are we that mmcblk0 and mmcblk1 are going to always turn up> that way round? I'd think that the presence of the rpmb/boot0/1 suffix> is the real key, in which case one could do:>
Hi, Phil.
Thanks for the suggestion here.
Yes, you are right. I completely lost the key point here.
Your patch makes more sense.
I am not familiar with the process here,
but I think the credit should be yours for this bug and the fix you mentioned,
so could you help send out a patch again for this bug?
Thank you.
Regards,
Tsung-Han