Your message dated Sat, 9 May 2015 00:16:20 +0200 with message-id <20150508221620.GA11440@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#461110: Status of this bug report has caused the Debian Bug report #461110, regarding please include packages from Priority: important to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 461110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461110 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: please include packages from Priority: important
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:57:26 +0100
- Message-id: <20080116165726.25702.28402.reportbug@thorin>
Package: tasksel Version: 2.71 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please move packages from Priority: important to tasksel so that user has the option to de-select them. They could be put together with the "standard" task (as attached patch does) or in a separate one. Also attaching the patch that would be needed in base-installer after this one. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)diff -ur tasksel-2.71.old/tasks/standard tasksel-2.71/tasks/standard --- tasksel-2.71.old/tasks/standard 2008-01-12 03:37:36.000000000 +0100 +++ tasksel-2.71/tasks/standard 2008-01-16 17:52:39.000000000 +0100 @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ Section: user Description: Standard system This task installs a reasonably small character-mode system. -Packages: standard +Packages: important standard Test-new-install: mark skipIndex: packages/base-installer/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst =================================================================== --- packages/base-installer/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst (revision 50234) +++ packages/base-installer/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst (working copy) @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ cdebootstrap || debootstrap_failed=$? else log-output -t debootstrap run-debootstrap \ + --variant=minbase \ --components="${COMPONENTS}" \ --debian-installer \ --resolve-deps \
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>, 461110-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#461110: Status of this bug report
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 00:16:20 +0200
- Message-id: <20150508221620.GA11440@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <20120712234907.GJ5755@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
- References: <20120712234907.GJ5755@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> (2012-07-12): > From what I read in this bug report, it suggest *two* things: > > - include important packages in the standard task > - make it possible to unselect them > > Joey clearly answered "no" to the second question, with the basic > argument that a package one would want eventually to drop from > important is probably not belonging to important. I buy that. > > I haven't seen an answer to the *first* question, so I'll make > mine. The purpose of putting a package in "standard" is.....exactly > having it installed by default on default installs. > > So, merging important into standard just makes the distinction between > standard and important pointless. I'm *very* tempted to mark this bug > as "wontfix". ACK. Closing accordingly. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---