[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#763324: task-italian: add dependence on libreoffice-l10n-it



Hello,

Nick Manini <nicola.manini@fisica.unimi.it> (2014-09-29):
> Package: task-italian
> Version: 3.27
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hello,
> 		the Italian spell checking was missing in my libreoffice.
> I assumed that task-italian would install it, but it didn't.
> 
> I eventually figured out that I needed libreoffice-l10n-it 
> It seems to me that the whole point of these taks-language package is to
> collect all that is required for language.
> 
> So task-italian should at least recommend libreoffice-l10n-it
> More accurately, it should depend on libreoffice-l10n-it in case
> libreoffice is installed, but I'm not sure this type of conditional
> dependence is possible within the Debian packaging system.
> 
> More in general, task-language should recommend the relevant
> libreoffice-l... package.
> See also bug #634974.

I've just looked into possibly adding the dependency as you suggested,
but here's an excerpt of tasksel's debian/control file:
| Package: task-italian
| Architecture: all
| Description: Italian environment
|  This task installs packages and documentation in Italian
|  to help Italian speaking people use Debian.
| Depends: ${misc:Depends},
|         manpages-it
| Recommends:
|         aspell-it,
|         debian-reference-it,
|         doc-linux-it,
|         doc-linux-it-text,
|         fortunes-it,
|         iitalian,
|         maint-guide-it,
|         witalian
| 
| Package: task-italian-desktop
| Architecture: all
| Description: Italian desktop
|  This task localises the desktop in Italian.
| Depends: ${misc:Depends},
| Recommends:
|         libreoffice-help-it,
|         libreoffice-l10n-it,
|         mythes-it,
|         iceweasel-l10n-it,
|         myspell-it

So I guess you want to install task-italian-desktop to get all
desktop-related translations? Which would make this bug report a
non-bug. :)

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: