On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 08:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 00:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 20:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 16:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > [...] > > > > Essentially if Boot-Device is set then Boot-*-Path should be relative to > > > > that device, if Boot-Device is not set then Boot-*-Path are relative > > > > to /. > > > > > > > > I think /dev/sda1 is your actual /boot and using Boot-Device in that > > > > case is wrong. If you remove it do things improve? > > > > > > Yes, this database entry works for me: > > > > > > Machine: Plat'Home OpenBlocks AX3-4 > > [...] > > > > Just kidding, you probably shouldn't change the Machine line. > > Right. > > Does your use of the other name suggest there is a second variant which > should have an entry though? (multiple Machine fields per entry are > valid too FWIW) No. I meant to 'correct' the name, but if I understand correctly this needs to match the name in the DTB and isn't used for anything else. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part