[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#783081: installation-reports: Jessie daily installer installs kernel in flash without any further confirmation (QNAP TS-212)



Hello,
one little addition about this installation.

Emails like following get generated once a day:

------
From root@nas3c3b5d Wed Apr 15 22:57:26 2015
Envelope-to: root@nas3c3b5d
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:57:26 +0200
From: mdadm monitoring <root@nas3c3b5d>
To: root@nas3c3b5d
Subject: DegradedArray event on /dev/md2:nas3c3b5d
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:57:26 +0200

This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm
running on nas3c3b5d

A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md2.

Faithfully yours, etc.

P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following:

Personalities : [raid1]
md2 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdb2[0]
      530048 blocks [2/1] [U_]

md9 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdb1[0]
      530048 blocks [2/1] [U_]
      bitmap: 65/65 pages [260KB], 4KB chunk

md13 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdb4[0]
      458880 blocks [2/1] [U_]
      bitmap: 47/57 pages [188KB], 4KB chunk

unused devices: <none>
------

When I remember correctly I saw those devices as default for at least a swap device.

As I wanted to leave the internal flash untouched I changed that to use/format only partitions on the usb stick.

While writing this email I realized that this md* devices are probably remainings of the original firmware which did setup my hard disk that way, even when I had until now never 2 disks installed.

------
root@nas3c3b5d:/home/bernhard# fdisk -l /dev/sdb

Disk /dev/sdb: 465,8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors

Device     Boot     Start       End   Sectors   Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1              40   1060289   1060250 517,7M 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2         1060296   2120579   1060284 517,7M 83 Linux
/dev/sdb3         2120584 975755969 973635386 464,3G 83 Linux
/dev/sdb4       975755976 976751999    996024 486,3M 83 Linux
------


Kind regards,
Bernhard


Reply to: