[d-i manual] missing arch-title entity definition in fr.ent for ppc64el
Hi Baptiste,
I just noted, that the french translation of the d-i manual was
lacking the definition of &arch-title; for the ppc64el architecture.
That leads to no text being displayed when that entity is used.
(I had the same problem in German, that where I saw it).
To fix that in time, I have added the english variant to the french file:
--- trunk/manual/build/entities/l10n/fr.ent 2014/11/22 01:15:37 69466
+++ trunk/manual/build/entities/l10n/fr.ent 2015/04/18 19:07:53 69829
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!ENTITY url-brltty-manual "http://brltty.com/doc/Manual-BRLTTY/French/BRLTTY.html">
<!ENTITY d-i "<classname>installateur Debian</classname>">
<!ENTITY arch-title
- "<phrase arch='any-amd64'>PC 64 bits</phrase><phrase arch='arm'>ARM</phrase><phrase arch='hppa'>PA-RISC</phrase><phrase arch='any-i386'>32 Bit-PC</phrase><phrase arch='ia64'>IA-64</phrase><phrase arch='mips'>Mips</phrase><phrase arch='mipsel'>Mipsel</phrase><phrase arch='powerpc'>PowerPC</phrase><phrase arch='sparc'>SPARC</phrase><phrase arch='s390'>S/390</phrase>">
+ "<phrase arch='any-amd64'>PC 64 bits</phrase><phrase arch='arm'>ARM</phrase><phrase arch='hppa'>PA-RISC</phrase><phrase arch='any-i386'>32 Bit-PC</phrase><phrase arch='ia64'>IA-64</phrase><phrase arch='mips'>Mips</phrase><phrase arch='mipsel'>Mipsel</phrase><phrase arch='powerpc'>PowerPC</phrase><phrase arch='ppc64el'>64-bit PowerPC (little-endian)</phrase><phrase arch='sparc'>SPARC</phrase><phrase arch='s390'>S/390</phrase>">
<!ENTITY enterkey "<keycap>Entrée</keycap>">
In short words: I added
<phrase arch='ppc64el'>64-bit PowerPC (little-endian)</phrase>
If you find the time before the release of Jessie, please translate that term
into correct French. Thanks
Regards
Holger
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y !
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Reply to: