[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Naming conventions



Using version numbers (8.0u1) and release codenames (jessie), each has its advantages.
Perhaps the best solutions is to combine the two, something like (8.0u1-jessie).

Version numbers are great for identifying exactly where the codebase is sequentially.
Codenames have more practical usefulness. 

For example, I am working on building d-i with the ZFS integration Turbo F. et. al. has done.
I am trying to build it for wheezy, but keep running into library dependency errors because I am using too new versions of base-installer, grub-installer, partman-target, partman-zfs, or debian-installer because the git masters have jessie updates.  It is hard to say which package is too new because all the git tags are only version numbers, no codenames.  So I need a way to map codenames (wheezy) to version numbers for these packages.  I am not sure how to get this information other than trial and error or asking someone who knows. 

Having combined version numbers and codenames would solve problems such as this.

Sam


Samuel Younge
samuel.young@live.com

Reply to: