[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hints for d-i



Hi Ivo,

Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> (2014-12-09):
> I added most of those.

thanks!

> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > # TODO: Check with Colin
> > unblock iprutils/2.4.5-1
> > unblock-udeb iprutils/2.4.5-1
> 
> Not added, based on the TODO.

ACK.

> > # TODO: Check with debian-bsd@
> > unblock kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn273874-1
> > unblock-udeb kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn273874-1
> 
> Added, based on https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/12/msg00003.html

Yes, thanks.

> > unblock netcfg/1.125
> > unblock-udeb netcfg/1.125
> 
> I added these hints for 1.126, as this adds another translation (I guess
> that's fine, but if it isn't, let me know).

Perfect (for all occurrences).

> > # TODO: pango1.0 isn't unblocked but:
> > unblock-udeb pango1.0/1.36.8-3
> 
> Added and unblocked.

Ta.

> > # TODO: KiBi uploaded that one:
> > unblock partman-base/180
> > unblock-udeb partman-base/180
> 
> There must be something different in the way bubulle and you generate the
> source package from the git repo, because the previous upload contains
> debian/*.dirs files, and the new one doesn't. I compared the contents of the
> resulting udebs, and it seems fine, so I added these as well.

Yes, kind of “known”, see e.g.
  https://lists.debian.org/20141125103513.GK19005@mraw.org
  https://lists.debian.org/20141125105646.GL19005@mraw.org
  https://lists.debian.org/20140928200350.GE10661@mraw.org

> > unblock partman-lvm/100
> > unblock-udeb partman-lvm/100
> 
> I didn't add this one, as 101 was uploaded, which contains the undocumented
> removal of post-base-installer.d/64partman-lvm

This is possibly the same story as above, except a checkout clean-up
happened between the 100 upload and the 101 one. Commit in master is:
| commit fc552ae118ae629501e8d6fe2d0174171e93e114
| Author: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrijs.ledkovs@canonical.com>
| Date:   Thu May 23 13:47:00 2013 +0100
| 
|     Move apt-install call from post-base-installer.d to finish.d, in case post-base-installer is not run at all (as is the case in ubiquity) or otherwise failed to run.

which includes:
 finish.d/aptinstall_lvm             | 11 +++++++++++
 post-base-installer.d/64partman-lvm | 11 -----------

Not touching it for now seems OK.

Many thanks again.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: