[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757988: marked as done (kfreebsd: troubles with dhcp (configuration going away))

Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:36:17 +0000
with message-id <E1XQ277-0004wP-FE@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#757988: fixed in netcfg 1.120
has caused the Debian Bug report #757988,
regarding kfreebsd: troubles with dhcp (configuration going away)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
757988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

Hi,

I know this is tracked as #757711 but I'm trying to get a comprehensive
list of issues affecting kfreebsd-*, along with possible solutions for
those using images.

So, using debian-jessie-DI-b1-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso with DHCP, an
error is shown right after the mirror selection, since network
configuration obtained through DHCP is lost at this point. It would be
nice to make sure what triggered this issue before blindly applying a
patch against netcfg IMHO.

Switching to vt2 (alt-f2), and typing this allowed me to resume my
(kvm-based) installation test:

  ifconfig re0 10.0.2.15 255.255.255.0
  route add default 10.0.2.2

(I hope my notes are correct on this, readers should get the idea
anyway.)

Mraw,
KiBi.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 1.120

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 757988@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:40:24 +0200
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source
Version: 1.120
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Description:
 netcfg     - Configure the network (udeb)
 netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 757711 757988
Changes:
 netcfg (1.120) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Steven Chamberlain ]
   * Do not kill_dhcp_client after setting the hostname and domain,
     otherwise Linux udhcpc will stop renewing its lease, and on other
     platforms dhclient will de-configure the network interface
     (Closes: #757711, #757988)
Checksums-Sha1:
 9aff82bc8c9a6168d9d759f127eee166b088cc03 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc
 84aae6b08df3544748a2cfab3e600bd00be4ea41 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 92f1fab69c2ae00fe46887aa68722f7e7762978b0371cf515dcff6e190ce0214 1890 netcfg_1.120.dsc
 eb538bec9d38828b23ff712305fed79345eec3d4ad52daeade212848aa22a7a7 392344 netcfg_1.120.tar.xz
Files:
 24511bfd4577cc22875bc5a68d281cbd 1890 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.dsc
 a7ecb39679d947dd237dd5da0ab97745 392344 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.120.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=YtKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: