On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [...] If a > single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to > time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status > is far too brittle. The fixed-size d-i initrds had to be carefully sized for kfreebsd wheezy. We discussed about a year ago the possibility of adding a variable-sized ramdisk to avoid ENOSPC, for anna/cdebconf in particular. It may affect our minimum RAM requirements. And/or we could maybe lose some unnecessary udebs. I mentioned partman-iscsi as an example to start with (I also didn't understand how/why that was being included in the image at all?) but there are probably other and larger candidates. This has a higher priority than the other issues. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature