[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#757575: transition: libgcrypt20



Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> (2014-08-10):
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgcrypt20.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
> 
> On 09/08/14 15:48, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I would like to make sure that we only ship one gcrypt version in
> > jessie and am therefore opening the transition tracker now.
> > 
> > libgcrypt20 is mostly API compatible to libgcrypt11. The main reason
> > why we have versioned -dev packages is that libgnutls26 is one of the
> > packages which cannot work with the old API. libgnutls26 should not be
> > shipped in jessie so I envision that it should be possible to make
> > major parts of this transition by bin-NMUs since I will be able to
> > make libgcrypt11-dev a dummy package depending on libgcrypt20-dev
> > after libgnutls26 has been dropped.
> > 
> > libgcrypt11's upstream support will end on 2016-12-31.
> > 
> > I will do some test builds to find out more.
> > 
> > Ben file:
> > 
> > title = "libgcrypt20";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libgcrypt11" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt20" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt11-dev" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt20-dev" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt-dev";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libgcrypt20";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libgcrypt11";
> 
> I have added a tracker for this (with minor tweaks). Let us know
> when you have more information on this.

Hello people,

please delay this until d-i beta 1 is out. I see we have at least this
involved:
| Package: libcryptsetup4-udeb
| Source: cryptsetup
| Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.18), libdevmapper1.02.1-udeb (>= 2:1.02.83), libgcrypt11-udeb (>= 1.5.0-0), libuuid1-udeb (>= 2.16)

Not having more moving pieces before this release happens would be nice.

Mraw,
KiBi.

[Cute bug bumber BTW. ;)]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: