John Hughes <john@calva.com> (2014-04-06): > Package: flash-kernel > Version: 3.3+deb7u2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > * What led up to the situation? > > Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > I built it in the directory containing the .git subdirectory > > * What was the outcome of this action? > > make-kpkg decided to call the kernel xxxx-kirkwood+-xxxx instead of > xxx-kirkwood-xxx, so flash-kernel considers it's no good for my system. > > * What outcome did you expect instead? > > flash-kernel should accept an image called xxx-kirkwood+ as valid for > a kirkwood system AFAICT make-kpkg is not considered supported, at least by the kernel team. I suggest you start using the deb-pkg target instead. I'm not going to oppose the change if someone wants to patch flash-kernel of course; just trying to share my understanding of the current situation. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature