[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#724931: Please include the patch in git



Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhalpun@googlemail.com> (2013-12-02):
> On Topic: It's always better, if more people look at a patch, so I'd
> be grateful for KiBi's thoughts on it, especially concerning the
> effects for kFreeBSD, since I could not test these, because I did
> not manage to unpack the initrd from the kFreeBSD ISO.

The easiest way to get feedback concerning kFreeBSD is contacting
debian-bsd@.

> I don't know really what you mean by invasive, but I assume you
> mean, that the installer could break, if apt-setup and cdrom-detect
> are not both updated at the same time. So let me clarify this a bit:
> The functionality to loopmount is not invasive at all, since the
> necessary code for this is only executed, if the boot parameter
> 'loopmount=' is given.
> 
> What makes this patch more invasive is the fact that it cleans up
> the somewhat messy workaround for bug #608201.
> Up to now the situation was, that for every non-CD boot method
> (usb-hdd/isohybrid) a template was exported from cdrom-detect and
> imported in apt-setup to check there, whether cdset-detection should
> automatically (u)mount \cdrom.
> I moved the code to determine this to cdrom-detect and only exported
> the result (cdrom_mountable) to apt-setup, so that in the future one
> does not have to change apt-setup (changes are needed only for cdset
> support), if one adds a new boot method.
> Thus if not both patches (cdrom-detect and apt-setup) are applied at
> the same time, apt-setup will fail, because it looks for a template
> that does not exist.

Given the apt-cdrom regression we're hitting (#740673), I don't feel
like shipping this amount of additional modifications in jessie alpha 1
images; on the other hand, not uploading what's in apt-setup's master
currently would mean not using updated l10n material, which isn't too
nice. I'm tempted to branch "iso-loopback" from current master, so that
it's easily found afterwards, and to revert the ISO loopback bits for
now.

Christian, can you please confirm that it makes sense on an l10n point
of view?

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: