Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> (2014-03-06): > That's #737580, which is fixed in 10.0-2 (experimental). Looking at 05_wipe_otherfs.patch in both versions, it looks like v9 could easily be fixed in the same way? If so, why not do that? Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice idea (even more so if they also manage to create UFS file systems), so that there's a reference image to check possible regressions (when switching to kfreebsd 10) against. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature