[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#213834: marked as done (depends on libc-udeb)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:58:03 +0100
with message-id <20140228215803.GH3084@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#213834: anna 0.060
has caused the Debian Bug report #213834,
regarding depends on libc-udeb
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
213834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=213834
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: anna
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

anna depends on libc-udeb. I don't understand why. If anna is on the
initrd, then it gets all necessary symbols thanks to library reduction.
If it is not on the initrd, then it's going to be hard to load libc-udeb
at all anyway, and the creator of the images hopefully knows what he was
doing to set up such a weird circumstance. 

In the meantime, just building d-i downloads all of libc-udeb, only to
throw it away, which makes it very painful on dialup.

Petter added the dependency to debian/control in cvs rev 1.25, with the
comment, "Replace ${shlibs:Depends} in depends to explicit list;
libc-udeb, cdebconf-udeb.".

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@debianpt.org> (2010-09-20):
> Hi all,
> 
> i found this entry in anna's changelog (version 0.060), which may be
> relevant to this bug:
> 
> - Stop hardcoding dependency on no longer existant libc-udeb, just use
> the libc6 dependency from substvars, and let libc6-udebs provide, plus
> libd-i's lack of version checking, do their thing.

I might be missing something but the current state of affairs (Depends on
libc$foo-udeb, with $foo varying across architectures) looks OK to me, so
closing this bug report.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: