[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#614862: marked as done (debian-installer: Still asks whether to enable volatile updates)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:51:04 +0100
with message-id <20140228205104.GA3662@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#492937: apt-setup: inconsistent path handling for 'security' and 'volatile' services
has caused the Debian Bug report #492937,
regarding debian-installer: Still asks whether to enable volatile updates
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106
Severity: normal

The volatile archive is discontinued in squeeze and replaced by the
squeeze-updates suite[0] but debian-installer still asks whether you
want to use it.

[0] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110215

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Vincent McIntyre <Vince.McIntyre@atnf.csiro.au> (2008-07-30):
> I was looking at packages/apt-setup/generators/and noticed a
> difference between the way that 91security and 92volatile add
> lines to the new sources.list file (subversion, r54582):
> […]

volatile.d.o is now gone and updates are available in the main
archive (see generators/92updates). Closing this bug report
accordingly.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: