[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make



Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2014-11-24):
> On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 14:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> > control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't build
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> [...] 
> > > Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd guess the
> > > easiest way to fix this would be to just request the removal of src:eglibc from
> > > sid.
> > 
> > It has already been removed as it can be seen in bug #753420. It's still
> > in the Sources files with Extra-Source-Only: yes, you should ignore
> > these packages when doing archive rebuilds.
> > 
> > It's still there because debian-installer from sparc is still using it.
> > I am therefore reassigning the bug to ftp.debian.org to ask for
> > debian-installer removal on sparc.
> 
> ftp-master mentioned on IRC that they'd like an explicit KiBi-{,n}ack on
> this; CCing.

Looking at the eglibc vs. glibc thing, it seems to be it wouldn't cause
any troubles if debian-installer were to build again on sparc later,
since it would then pull the new glibc package as Extra-Source-Only:
yes? So there's no need to try and make sure it no longer builds there
(n-f-u or similar)?

In which case: yes, it looks to me old binaries can be removed.

[ Cc-ing debian-boot@ just in case. ]

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: