Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> (2014-11-24): > Well, sorry for this Cyril. My interpretation is that this *was* > making sense for Jessie, indeed. The bug is in Jessie and I think that > having an "easier-to-use" debootstrap in Jessie is good for the future > and worth a freeze exception. Such bugs easily fall in the category of > "those bugs we only really care when the release is close", and so > low invasive that arguing for a freeze exception is kinda easy. > > I should have talked about that first in -boot before shooting, > though. Sorry for the trouble. [ I think I sent my mail too fast anyway, I meant to add: ] This is my fault, I meant to send a mail about master vs. jessie/stretch branches, specifically after this push to master, but got swamped with work in the meanwhile and only thought about it again when I saw the "Processing" mails. Not much harm done anyway, probably a nice-yet-not-ideal-reminder that I should communicate more. I'll try and get that fixed this week. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature