[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)

Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try
> > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages,
> > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon.
> >
> > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm
> > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully
> > test the resulting packages and installation images.

I will try to find time to do this.  Probably it is desirable, because it
should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks?

> Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat
> easy for porters to test?

I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image
from them myself.  But doing so would allow others to be testing it
meanwhile, so I'm okay with it.

Steven Chamberlain

Reply to: