Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try
> > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages,
> > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon.
> > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm
> > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully
> > test the resulting packages and installation images.
I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because it
should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks?
> Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat
> easy for porters to test?
I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image
from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it
meanwhile, so I'm okay with it.