Simon McVittie <email@example.com> (2014-09-30): > On 30/09/14 18:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > TL;DR: nack for now. > > Sure, no problem. Hopefully lifting the block-udeb in the normal way > after the beta will be enough to resolve this. > > > According to my fuzzy memory (and past excuses files), the root > > reason is that systemd hasn't been a candidate in a while (too > > young and/or RC buggy). > > Yes, it had RC bugs for a while but they seem to have been addressed > in unstable now. It's still a bit too new though (2/5 days). > > > (systemd means udev-udeb, nothing something I'd like to rush in at > > the last minute.) > > I'd forgotten about udev-udeb, and yes, that's a good reason to not > rush it! > > > FWIW it might be a nice idea to coordinate such requests with > > Michael since I already replied on that topic on #-release earlier > > today… > > Sorry, I should have mentioned that I filed this in response to IRC > discussion with Michael (about some lower-priority dbus changes which > I didn't want uploaded until it migrates), and I had X-Debbugs-Cc'd > him in the bug report. Both are in, closing. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature