[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#712907: grub-installer: No longer installs automatically on a normal machine with one hard drive



Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> (2014-09-15):
> On 15/09/14 08:36, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Samuel Thibault]
> >> I have attached the syslog, "interestingly":
> >>
> >> Aug 26 00:10:17 grub-installer: info: Installing grub on ''
> > 
> > Yes, I suspect that is a typo in the script somewhere, failing to set
> > the default.  partman succeed in picking a good default, perhaps
> > grub-installer can use the same logic?
> 
> FWIW I've been looking into this issue already in the past few days.
> 
> At this point I'd say Petter's patch shouldn't be necessary, because the
> intent was for the 'list' dialog to have an entry pre-selected (or not
> show that dialog at all).  That only works sometimes (e.g. PXE), but in
> other cases (including CD-ROM) it appears grub-installer correctly
> guessed the boot device (based on filesystem containing /boot) and just
> didn't pre-select it in the dialog.  That causes the regression in auto
> preseed installs.
> 
> I suggest to actually remove this dialog now:
> >     Install the GRUB boot loader to the master boot record?
> >     <Go Back>  <Yes> <No>
> 
> because it doesn't make it clear which device we're actually installing
> to.

Errr, it doesn't have to. It's about *whether* touching the/a MBR is
desired.

>     If our guess was wrong, we want to give the user a chance to
> correct it.  The new dialog can serve the same purpose and is more
> informative:
> >     Device for boot loader installation:
> >     [ ] Enter device manually
> >     [o] /dev/sda (ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00001)
> >     <Go Back>
> 
> How do people feel about me making such a change?  I think it will make
> the real bug (that we sometimes don't pre-select an option in that
> dialog despite having a good guess) easier for everyone to see.

I still disagree with the "good guess" assessment! Repeating that over
and over and over and over again is *not* going to make it true.

Touching other prompts doesn't look like a safe, or welcome, or proper
change to me.

KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: