Quoting Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org): > > Anyone understanding what's happening? > > See the cdebconf-slang-udeb stanza in debian/control. > > I suppose some dak changes triggered the reject. I'm not sure the > exception is expected though, so cc-ing ftpmaster@. > Hmmm, so as I understand the "Architecture: disabled" stanza was mostly a hack to avoid the udeb being built at all. I don't find when and why this was introduced but we maybe whouls just drop the binary package from debian/control, then? (we anyway use the "newt" variant)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature