Jonas Meurer <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2014-08-22): > Thanks for your help Cyril. Does this mean, that you're ok with > cryptsetup keeping libgcrypt20 dependency now that the corresponding > udeb will be in Debian soon? It's already in. ;) https://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgcrypt20/news/20140821T210007Z.html I was just waiting confirmation and indeed last run has: | Newly-fixed packages in unstable | cryptsetup-udeb amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel powerpc s390x sparc | libcryptsetup4-udeb amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel powerpc s390x sparc | partman-crypto-dm amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel powerpc s390x sparc | rescue-mode amd64 i386 mipsel powerpc sparc | | Uninstallability trend: better (+0/-29) | Uninstallability count: 494 → Closing this bug report accordingly. :) > Sorry that I didn't coordinate with debian-boot. I simply didn't think > about the consequences enough. I guess that's due to me not being > involved in library transitions too often :-/ *sorry* Don't worry, that's fine. That was caught by the (un)installability checker, fixed in a few days; nothing to worry about. udebs are a bit special and it's not as easy to make sure everything is fine as it is for regular packages. I haven't checked cryptsetup works fine yet, though. But that's another story. :) Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature