Re: libespeak / espeakup
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 11 Jul 2014 11:58:31 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 11 Jul 2014 11:04:02 +0200, a écrit :
> > Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 07 Jul 2014 02:44:03 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Right now we have a cronned edos/dose job that looks for uninstallable
> > > udebs and let me know when situation changes (be it for better or for
> > > worse); so at least the detection side is implemented already,
> >
> > Not completely: for now espeakup-udeb has an unversioned dependency on
> > espeak-data-udeb. But that will probably be far easier and maintain than
> > several udebs, I'll have a look.
>
> It does seem to work fine. I'll drop the libespeak-udeb package then.
We'll actually be able to check that the uninstallability test and
binNMU of espeakup to fix it works fine, since I had added +dfsg suffix
for the repackaging of the upstream espeak tarball.
Samuel
Reply to: