[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#304729: marked as done (doesn't document access floppies)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:00:36 +0100
with message-id <20140317000036.GA29007@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#304729: doesn't document access floppies
has caused the Debian Bug report #304729,
regarding doesn't document access floppies
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
304729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=304729
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer-manual
Version: 20050317
Severity: normal

There is one mention of the speakup kernel flavour in the manual, but no
details and really no documentation of the access floppy images at all.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (2005-04-15):
> I'm afraid the access floppies haven't be widely tested, so do we
> really support them ?
> 
> I don't remember the name of the person who was involved in them last
> year and who tried to test them, but he seems to have vanished,
> unfortunately.
> 
> Maybe calling for testers in -devel or -users?
> 
> IIRC, they are designed for blind people or people with a bad vision
> (sorry, I'm not aware of the politically correct term here) and use a
> special kernel with "speakup" features. Do I miss some other feature ?
> 
> We should maybe try with the Debian accessibility list (I think there
> is one but am not online ATM)?

Installation guide has “5.2. Accessibility” now. AFAICT the accessibility
bits have been working fine for a while, even if regressions are likely (on
the installed system side) after the switch to Xfce as a default desktop.

Anyway, the initial topic has been dealt with, so closing.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: