[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#149536: marked as done (libdiscover-dev: Want to compile with dietlibc)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:39:49 +0100
with message-id <20140316223949.GA19175@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: libdiscover-dev: Want to compile with dietlibc
has caused the Debian Bug report #149536,
regarding libdiscover-dev: Want to compile with dietlibc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
149536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=149536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libdiscover-dev
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: wishlist

Libdiscover does not link with dietlibc. I would like to use some
of its function in a small C Programm, which I want to link
statically with dietlibc. It does not work because of unresolved sysmbols,
eg. getdelim().

I can hack libdiscover so it works, but I would like to hear some comments
about this.

Greetings,
Oliver

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux robin 2.4.16-pre1 #1 Mon Nov 26 17:57:01 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages libdiscover-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev                     2.2.5-6    GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libdiscover1                  1.4-1      hardware identification library

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> (2004-04-03):
> Version 2 of discover is now in Debian Unstable.  I suspect the
> rewrite should happen there, if at all.  So I reassign this bug
> to the version 2 package.

That was almost 10 years ago, there were no follow-ups, so I'm
closing this bug report.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: