[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738922: [PATCH 2/3] Use dosfstools to format/check fat instead of libparted



---
 check.d/check_basicfilesystems   | 15 +++++++++++---
 commit.d/format_basicfilesystems | 45 +++++++++-------------------------------
 debian/changelog                 |  2 ++
 debian/control                   |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/check.d/check_basicfilesystems b/check.d/check_basicfilesystems
index 0684ec7..5d232c3 100755
--- a/check.d/check_basicfilesystems
+++ b/check.d/check_basicfilesystems
@@ -29,10 +29,19 @@ for dev in $DEVICES/*; do
 			db_subst $template TYPE "$RET"
 			db_subst $template PARTITION "$num"
 			db_subst $template DEVICE $(humandev $(cat device))
-			name_progress_bar $template
-			open_dialog CHECK_FILE_SYSTEM $id
-			read_line status
+			open_dialog PARTITION_INFO $id
+			read_line x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 device x6
 			close_dialog
+			db_progress START 0 1 partman/text/please_wait
+			db_progress INFO $template
+			if log-output -t partman --pass-stdout \
+			    dosfsck -n $device >/dev/null; then
+			    status=good
+			else
+			    status=failed
+			fi
+			db_progress STOP    
+
 			if [ "$status" != good ]; then
 				db_subst partman-basicfilesystems/check_failed TYPE "$filesystem"
 				db_subst partman-basicfilesystems/check_failed PARTITION "$num"
diff --git a/commit.d/format_basicfilesystems b/commit.d/format_basicfilesystems
index 2b24dee..8724526 100755
--- a/commit.d/format_basicfilesystems
+++ b/commit.d/format_basicfilesystems
@@ -61,44 +61,19 @@ for dev in $DEVICES/*; do
 					read_line status
 					close_dialog
 					sync
+
+			    fat16|fat32)
+				db_progress START 0 3 partman/text/formatting
+				db_progress INFO $template
+				db_progress SET 1
+				if log-output -t partman --pass-stdout \
+				    mkfs.$filesystem $device >/dev/null; then
+				    status=OK
 				else
-					status=failed
-				fi
-				if [ "$status" != OK ]; then
-					db_progress START 0 3 partman/text/formatting
-					db_progress INFO $template
-					db_progress SET 1
-					if log-output -t partman --pass-stdout \
-					   mkfs.ext2 $device $options >/dev/null; then
-						sync
-						status=OK
-					else
-						status=failed
-					fi
-					db_progress STOP
+				    status=failed
 				fi
-				if [ "$status" = OK ]; then
-					label=''
-					if [ -f $id/label ]; then
-						label=$(cat $id/label | \
-							sed 's/\(................\).*/\1/g')
-					fi
-					if [ "$label" ]; then
-						log-output -t partman --pass-stdout \
-							tune2fs -L "$label" $device >/dev/null
-					fi
-					if [ -f $id/reserved_for_root ]; then
-						log-output -t partman --pass-stdout \
-							tune2fs -m $(cat $id/reserved_for_root) $device >/dev/null
-					fi
-				fi
-				;;
-			    fat16|fat32)
-				name_progress_bar $template
-				open_dialog CREATE_FILE_SYSTEM $id $filesystem
-				read_line status
-				close_dialog
 				sync
+				db_progress STOP    
 				;;
 			esac
 
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index be32c03..8a8fc5b 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ partman-basicfilesystems (91) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
   * Use only mkswap instead of parted to format swap, since this is no
     longer supported in parted3.
   * Remove check_swap, as there is no such thing as fscking swap
+  * Use dosfstools to format and check fat filesystems rather than
+    libparted.
 
  -- Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>  Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:56:24 -0500
 
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f326b28..82f7288 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/d-i/partman-basicfilesystems.git
 Package: partman-basicfilesystems
 Package-Type: udeb
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, e2fsprogs-udeb, ext2-modules, fat-modules
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, e2fsprogs-udeb, ext2-modules, fat-modules, dosfstools-udeb
 Provides: partman-filesystem
 Description: Add to partman support for ext2, linux-swap, fat16 and fat32
-- 
1.8.3.2


Reply to: