Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:31:53 +0100 with message-id <20140228213153.GF3084@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#368243: packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup has caused the Debian Bug report #368243, regarding packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 368243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368243 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup
- From: Steffen Joeris <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:20:05 +0200
- Message-id: <20060520192005.23348.87993.reportbug@katha>
Package: apt-setup Severity: wishlist Hi Here a short report from my mail to debian-boot, I am posting it as a wishlist bug :) <--snip--> I wondered if it would be possible to outsource the security mirror stuff (90 security) into an own package, maybe apt-mirror-setup*udeb ? I guess this is also done with the apt-mirror-setup and apt-cdrom-setup packages or? <--snip--> This would allow others to decide if they want to include this udeb into the installation or not. Short report why I would like to have it: When the security mirror question is inputed the network is not yet setup and therefore no mirror can be called. Anyway we are including the security mirror later, so it would be nice to have the opportunity to skip this part during the installation :) Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 368243-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#368243: packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:31:53 +0100
- Message-id: <20140228213153.GF3084@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140228210506.GA5225@mraw.org>
- References: <20060520192005.23348.87993.reportbug@katha> <[🔎] 20140228210506.GA5225@mraw.org>
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2014-02-28): > I'm not sure what the "security mirror question" means. > apt-setup/security_host maybe? AFAICT the network is set up long before > we hit apt-setup so I'm not sure I understand what you're requesting. <white@apu.snow-crash.org>: Command died with status 127: "exec /usr/bin/procmail". Command output: sh: 1: exec: /usr/bin/procmail: not found → closing. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---