Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> (2014-02-25): > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:10:42PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I haven't done anything about this and don't expect to do so any > > time soon. Alright, thanks for the update. > > I think the GRUB maintainers are hoping to be able to support ~all > > our Linux architectures, so we may at some point be able to stop > > supporting direct loading of the kernel by the stupider > > boot-loaders. We're not there yet, though. > > Do the different architectures use different pre-seeds, or different > base-installer configurations? Might it be possible to keep > do_symlinks=yes on architectures where the bootloader requires the > symlinks, while eliminating it on the architectures that no longer > need that? See install_kernel_* in library.sh; I'm not very keen on adding complexity just for cosmetic reasons. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature