Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> (2014-02-24): > Colin Watson, le Tue 25 Feb 2014 00:12:43 +0000, a écrit : > > The situation where we have to occasionally rebuild espeakup due to > > new upstream versions of espeak is clearly far from ideal, and I'm > > making another clone for that. I'm going to assume the issue is that we have a weak Depends: espeak-data-udeb (from src:espeak) in espeakup-udeb (from src:espeakup). If that's correct, why not just make it a stronger Depends, using something like: Depends: espeak-data-udeb (>= uv), espeak-data-udeb (<< uv-next) where uv is espeak's upstream version, and uv-next the next one? > Yes. I've had a look, and it's not completely trivial: we used to just > statically link espeak, portaudio, jack, and sonic into espeakup. Since > it's espeak which needs portaudio+jack+sonic, making espeak linked > dynamically means portaudio+sonic have to be linked dynamically too, > i.e. yet two new udebs (jack can be disabled in portaudio build). Is > that fine with debian-boot? I expect the size increase to be something > like a few 100KiB, on the gtk image. Before considering size increase, I'd like to better grasp the issue we're trying to solve. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature