Josh Triplett wrote: > I wasn't suggesting a requirement; I was suggesting that if systemd > becomes the default, there will likely be advantages to switching d-i to > use the same init that installed Debian systems do. It's possible I suppose, but since d-i doesn't currently use Debian's init system, and has other constraints, I am doubtful. > Quietness on success has some significant advantages to justify not > disabling it Is quietness of success actually intended to be a default property of systemd? If a lot of distributions default to adding the quiet kernel boot parameter then maybe, but I don't know if that is the case, and systemd does not do quiet on success without it, which argues that it may not be the intended upstream default behavior. Which in turn may be why systemd has not put much effort into handling debuggability in that configuration. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature