Bug#701201: requested libata.force and time information
I haven't done it before but now I tried to replace libata.atapi_passthru16=0 against libata.force=noncq and it was successful. Which of both solutions would you prefer?
time /lib/udev/ata_id --export /dev/sr0 returns:
ID_ATA=1
ID_TYPE=cd
ID_BUS=ata
ID_MODEL=ATAPI_DVD_A_DH16ABSH
ID_MODEL_ENC=ATAPI\x20\x20\x20DVD\x20A\x20\x20DH16ABSH\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20
ID_REVISION=YA12
ID_SERIAL=ATAPI_DVD_A_DH16ABSH_KU0160F01110106A51F3
ID_SERIAL_SHORT=KU0160F01110106A51F3
real 0m0.009s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
Reply to: