On 07.02.2013 08:06, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 02/07/2013 07:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> I think it is obvious by now that reverting to syslinux 4 from wheezy is >> the only sensible way forward at this point in the release. > > 'obvious'? Imho, yes. But then, it's not up to me to decide. > * patch applied against debian-installer to include the additionally > required .c32 modules when using vesamenu.c32 > > * patch applied against debian-cd to include the additionally required > .c32 modules when using vesamenu.c32 > > * cherry-pick upstream commit to fix a bug in vbox This list is getting longer with each email. Seeing that syslinux 5 has been in sid for less then 10 days, I'm worried what other issues might show up. While I can understand (from personal experience) that freeze-time is sometimes frustrating, delaying the release even further doesn't help anyone. If we want to improve our procedures, how we handle d-i, freeze etc, now is not the time to discuss/work on this. Just my 2¢ Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature