Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:52:55 +0200 with message-id <201308311253.30231.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #694247, regarding installation-report: problems with installation from iso-file present on hard drive (loop.ko and pata_amd.ko is absent) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694247: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694247 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: installation-report: problems with installation from iso-file present on hard drive (loop.ko and pata_amd.ko is absent)
- From: "Vasiliy D." <defun44@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:51:27 +0700
- Message-id: <CADpvLrdY1+onE-ePCAU6+U2sK+bSKV140EeoHZctC5jTzAF86w@mail.gmail.com>
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.6/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.6-amd64-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso) I boot from my hdd with grub:When I try install Debian (
menuentry 'debian-6.06-amd64.iso' {
loopback loop /debian.iso
linux (loop)/install.amd/vmlinuz vga=788 iso-scan/filename=/debian.iso -- quiet
initrd (loop)/install.amd/initrd.gz
}
But the option "iso-scan/filename" not work (Ok. It's normal. It's work with a Ubuntu *.iso. I try it for Debian, but without success.) The Debian image not include kernel module loop.ko, so not with the option, not manually I can't mount iso-file
and install Debian. That's bad, but not fatal.
I find here (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apas02.html#howto-getting-images-hard-disk) a way install Debian from my hdd with iso-file. I boot with this (http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/{initrd.gz,vmlinuz}) and try this (http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/{initrd.gz,vmlinuz}) too, but both of them don't have kernel module pata_amd.ko and my hdd don't appears in /dev after boot and I can't install Debian. I don't know, is it a bug or not? It's no fatal for me, too. I boot and install Debian from my usb flash drive, but more convenient ways is desirable. Thanks.
P.s. I'm sorry for my English. I hope it don't hurt your heart and ruin your brain.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 695669-done@bugs.debian.org, 695476-done@bugs.debian.org, 695180-done@bugs.debian.org, 695058-done@bugs.debian.org, 695008-done@bugs.debian.org, 694934-done@bugs.debian.org, 694803-done@bugs.debian.org, 694788-done@bugs.debian.org, 694777-done@bugs.debian.org, 694771-done@bugs.debian.org, 694722-done@bugs.debian.org, 694247-done@bugs.debian.org, 694062-done@bugs.debian.org, 693891-done@bugs.debian.org, 693756-done@bugs.debian.org, 693756-done@bugs.debian.org, 692731-done@bugs.debian.org, 692475-done@bugs.debian.org, 692437-done@bugs.debian.org, 689849-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dealing with old installation-reports
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:52:55 +0200
- Message-id: <201308311253.30231.holger@layer-acht.org>
Hi, thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated. I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if - they (finally) indicated success and/or - I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in Wheezy and/or - they only contained very little information and/or - they contained user errors and/or - they were caused by broken hardware and/or - they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or - they are quite old (and thus likely fixed today) and/or - moreinfo was asked and not given or - they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to close wishlist bugs.) If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft. cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---