[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706163: marked as done (debian-installer: non-lvm+lvm setup with expert_recipe doesn't work with wheezy)

Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:11:56 +0200
with message-id <201308301712.15069.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #706163,
regarding debian-installer: non-lvm+lvm setup with expert_recipe doesn't work with wheezy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706163: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Tags: d-i

Hi,

I'm using Foreman as provisioning server and having a template which I'm using
for unattended installations of Debian and Ubuntu. It works for Debian 6.0 and
Ubuntu 12.04. Today I tried it with Debian 7.0 and I'm getting:

Unexpected error while creating volume group
Autopartitioning using LVM failed because an error occurred while creating the
volume group.

The pxelinux and preseed files can be found here: http://space.kvedulv.de/d-i/
The debug logs of the installation process can be found there in the "logs"
subdirectory.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
tags 435769 + confirmed
tags 720719 + confirmed
tags 720162 + confirmed
tags 700026 + confirmed
tags 616512 + confirmed
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much 
appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug 
log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: