Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200 with message-id <201308251243.25305.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #685515, regarding Wheezy beta 1 LXDE-CD1 installer does not uncomment deb cdrom in sources.list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685515 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Wheezy beta 1 LXDE-CD1 installer does not uncomment deb cdrom in sources.list
- From: Bertil <bkronmailbox-debian@yahoo.se>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:19:41 +0100 (BST)
- Message-id: <1345558781.94620.YahooMailNeo@web171402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Bertil <bkronmailbox-debian@yahoo.se>
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I just finished the installation process (basic install and with encrypted swap) with the Wheezy beta 1 (July14).Two observations which I think is incorrect.(1) At the end of the installer process, the screen message say something like "..commenting out 'NETINST".(2) If I open '/etc/apt/sources.list' in an editor after the very first reboot we have two lines at the top:# deb cdrom: [Debian GNU/Linux wheezy-DI-b1 "Wheezy" - Official Snapshot i386 xfce+lxde-CD Binary-1 20120714-22:51]/ wheezy maindeb cdrom: [Debian GNU/Linux wheezy-DI-b1 "Wheezy" - Official Snapshot i386 xfce+lxde-CD Binary-1 20120714-22:51]/ wheezy main(1) The CD really is as (2) indicates and not NETINST. Confirmed from the CD and the '.disk/info file').(2) Obviously what the installer tried to do in (1) never happened with the second line.
The installation was done on HP laptop and was otherwise successful.Cheers Bertil-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 696737-done@bugs.debian.org, 607698-done@bugs.debian.org, 606496-done@bugs.debian.org, 603960-done@bugs.debian.org, 701827-done@bugs.debian.org, 686786-done@bugs.debian.org, 685681-done@bugs.debian.org, 685515-done@bugs.debian.org, 685047-done@bugs.debian.org, 685308-done@bugs.debian.org, 684639-done@bugs.debian.org, 683706-done@bugs.debian.org, 683705-done@bugs.debian.org, 683381-done@bugs.debian.org, 682753-done@bugs.debian.org, 682507-done@bugs.debian.org, 682008-done@bugs.debian.org, 680555-done@bugs.debian.org, 681673-done@bugs.debian.org, 680026-done@bugs.debian.org, 679795-done@bugs.debian.org, 675127-done@bugs.debian.org, 674855-done@bugs.debian.org, 672317-done@bugs.debian.org, 673649-done@bugs.debian.org, 605076-done@bugs.debian.org, 690752-done@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dealing with old installation-reports
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200
- Message-id: <201308251243.25305.holger@layer-acht.org>
reassign 701201 src:linux retitle 701201 libata.atapi_passthru16=0 is needed by some hardware forcemerge 690985 686954 thanks Hi, thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated. I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if - they (finally) indicated success and/or - I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in Wheezy and/or - they only contained very little information and/or - they contained user errors and/or - they were caused by broken hardware and/or - they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or - they are quite old (and thus likely fixed today) and/or - moreinfo was asked and not given. If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft. cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---