Your message dated Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:34:46 +0200 with message-id <201307301135.02366.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #672219, regarding OS install fails at package config to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 672219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672219 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: OS install fails at package config
- From: Aaron Paden <aaronbpaden@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 03:34:41 -0500
- Message-id: <CAJakPQDRXx63VvD_bYjUnUoXOtpiCxaPz-a=5endJyidQ3fDpQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <CAJakPQBee587Bbqs-jVAePMrgpLq5GvgiXBDgJ8L9b=oeTEY=A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJakPQBee587Bbqs-jVAePMrgpLq5GvgiXBDgJ8L9b=oeTEY=A@mail.gmail.com>
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.4/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.4-i386-businesscard.iso Date: Today, during the past couple hours. 3:15 AM CST Machine: Just some old beige box. Processor: Intel® Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.60GHz Memory: This Ubuntu Live cd is reporting 748.2 MB, which seems like an odd number Partitions: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders, total 78165360 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0006196c Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 2048 75141119 37569536 83 Linux /dev/sda2 75143166 78163967 1510401 5 Extended /dev/sda5 75143168 78163967 1510400 82 Linux swap / Solaris Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82845 845 [Brookdale] Chipset Host Bridge [8086:1a30] (rev 04) Subsystem: Intel Corporation 82845 845 [Brookdale] Chipset Host Bridge [8086:1a30] Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82845 845 [Brookdale] Chipset AGP Bridge [8086:1a31] (rev 04) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge [8086:244e] (rev 05) Kernel modules: shpchp 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) [8086:2440] (rev 05) Kernel modules: iTCO_wdt, intel-rng 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801BA IDE U100 Controller [8086:244b] (rev 05) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2442] Kernel driver in use: ata_piix 00:1f.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM USB Controller #1 [8086:2442] (rev 05) Subsystem: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM USB Controller #1 [8086:2442] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM SMBus Controller [8086:2443] (rev 05) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2442] Kernel modules: i2c-i801 00:1f.4 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM USB Controller #1 [8086:2444] (rev 05) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2442] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:2445] (rev 05) Subsystem: Analog Devices Device [11d4:5360] Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0 Kernel modules: snd-intel8x0 02:04.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] [10de:0326] (rev a1) Kernel driver in use: nouveau Kernel modules: nouveau, nvidiafb 02:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] [10b7:9055] (rev 30) Subsystem: 3Com Corporation 3C905B Fast Etherlink XL 10/100 [10b7:9055] Kernel driver in use: 3c59x Kernel modules: 3c59x 02:0a.0 Communication controller [0780]: Conexant Systems, Inc. HCF 56k Data/Fax/Voice/Spkp Modem [14f1:1036] (rev 08) Subsystem: Conexant Systems, Inc. HCF 56k Data/Fax/Voice/Spkp Modem [14f1:1036] Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ O ] Detect network card: [ O ] Configure network: [ O ] Detect CD: [ O ] Load installer modules: [ O ] Detect hard drives: [ O ] Partition hard drives: [ O ] Install base system: [ O ] Clock/timezone setup: [ O ] User/password setup: [ O ] Install tasks: [ E ] Install boot loader: [ E ] Overall install: [ E ] Comments/Problems: The install fails when it tries to set up the additional software. Grub and lilo both give errors, as well. I've tared the logs for later review.Attachment: install.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: control@bugs.debian.org, 681267-done@bugs.debian.org, 680318-done@bugs.debian.org, 672219-done@bugs.debian.org, 657154-done@bugs.debian.org, 642574-done@bugs.debian.org, 629615-done@bugs.debian.org, 704282-done@bugs.debian.org, 666547-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dealing with old installation-reports
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:34:46 +0200
- Message-id: <201307301135.02366.holger@layer-acht.org>
reassign 709005 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau reassign 706880 network-manager reassign 658344 xserver-xorg severity 666547 normal # 666547 is "lovely". close? thanks Hi, thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated. I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if - they (finally) indicated success and/or - I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in Wheezy and/or - they only contained very little information and/or - they contained user errors and/or - they were caused by broken hardware and/or - they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or - they are very old (and due to the above reasons very probably fixed by now). If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft. cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---