> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:59:29 +0400 > From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > To: Jackson Doak <noskcaj@ubuntu.com>, 716808-done@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#716808: Busybox is outdated > Organization: Telecom Service, JSC > > 13.07.2013 08:53, Jackson Doak wrote: > > http://busybox.net has the details and a complete list of changes > > I was tempted to close the bug report at the first reply. > Now closing it for real. > Thank you for contributing. Hello, While the original way this suggestion was reported is not my preferred way and would also have made me grumpy, I don't see any valid reason for this bug to not be valid. If upstream published a version higher than the one we have, our users are perfectly entitled to report a (wishlist) bug pointing to it. Unless the version we have in Debian is indeed the upstream-publiched higher version (but with a lower version number), I think this bug shouldn't be closed as is....even if nothing enforces us to upgrade to latest upstream of course.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature