Re: installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?

To: Regid Ichira <regid23@nt1.in>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:20:58 +0200
Message-id: <20130419002058.GM9016@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
Mail-followup-to: Regid Ichira <regid23@nt1.in>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20130418140118.GC14436@nt1.in>
References: <20130418140118.GC14436@nt1.in>

Regid Ichira, le Thu 18 Apr 2013 17:01:18 +0300, a écrit :
> Isn't the default ext4?

Indeed!

I have fixed the manual and translations (yes, I know how "ext3" and
"ext4" are translated in all languages ;)

Thanks,
Samuel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?
  - From: Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de>

References:
- installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?
  - From: Regid Ichira <regid23@nt1.in>

Prev by Date: Re: installing on mdraid imsm arrays
Next by Date: Re: d-i wheezy rc2 preparation, take 2 [rfc patch]
Previous by thread: installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?
Next by thread: Re: installation-manual: section 6.3.3.1: Isn't ext4 the default fs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread