[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680084: duplicate or os-prober nmu? [Was: Bug#680084: nmu]



Hi,

Michael Gilbert wrote (13 Nov 2012 00:09:04 GMT) :
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Isn't this bug just a dupe of 684293, in which case it doesn't need
>> an os-prober change?
> Possibly. I've never been able to reproduce the issue myself, so
> deferring to Integeri:  #684293 is fixed in kernels > 3.2.29,

> was your testing done on an earlier version than this

Possibly.

> and if so can you test with a newer kernel?

With linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (3.2.32-1) from current Wheezy,

  * I can reproduce the issue I've described on #680084 with stock
    os-prober 1.56
  * I can't reproduce it with my patch applied.

So, it does not look like a duplicate of #684293.

> In the meantime, I've canceled the nmu since it may not be needed.

IIRC Cyril wanted to review my patch, so you might want to check with
him before NMU'ing again.

@Michael: you mistyped my email address into "integeri",
but luckily I was subscribed to the bug :)

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


Reply to: