On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:53:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > I'm not, I'm just looking at grep-excuses, which suggests either > > klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should exist on ia64 or rootskel-bootfloppy > > should be killed there. > > Quite likely rooskel-bootfloppy and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should be > killed *everywhere*. It's not like the kernel has fit on a floppy in 4 > years on i386. > > At some point, leaving this cruft around in hopes that the kernel will > magically be halfed in size is counterproductive. And what about floppy-retriever? Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature