Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation,
> and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is
> a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why
> it is not.
Ok. This was premature. Somehow I received this "reassigning"
message quite a bit before the comments you actually added when
doing it the second time. So yes, there are some comments now,
I stand corrected. I'll address these in #676001.