Bug#670941: network-console: set LED signal on LaCie Kirkwood NASes when SSH is ready
Package: network-console
Version: 1.30
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Dear Maintainer,
Please consider applying the attached patch.
Regards,
Simon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-00010-g0a7ba17 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages network-console depends on:
pn cdebconf-udeb <none>
pn configured-network <none>
pn openssh-server-udeb <none>
network-console recommends no packages.
network-console suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
>From 1c17d91763aa63fa96a85db53ded0f90b9736dbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:06:41 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Turn red front LED on LaCie NAS when SSH is ready
---
debian/network-console.postinst | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/network-console.postinst b/debian/network-console.postinst
index c5c0560..46fcf86 100755
--- a/debian/network-console.postinst
+++ b/debian/network-console.postinst
@@ -101,6 +101,23 @@ case "$ARCHDETECT" in
qcommand statusled greenon
qcommand buzzer short
fi
+ # LaCie Network Space v2 (and parents) and d2 Network v2
+ for led_dev in ns_v2 d2net_v2; do
+ if [ -e /sys/class/leds/$led_dev:blue:sata/brightness ]; then
+ echo 0 > /sys/class/leds/$led_dev:blue:sata/brightness
+ fi
+ if [ -e /sys/class/leds/$led_dev:red:fail/brightness ]; then
+ echo 255 > /sys/class/leds/$led_dev:red:fail/brightness
+ fi
+ done
+ # LaCie 2Big Network v2
+ if [ -e /sys/class/leds/net2big-v2:red:power/brightness ]; then
+ echo 255 > /sys/class/leds/net2big-v2:red:power/brightness
+ fi
+ # LaCie 5Big Network v2
+ if [ -e /sys/class/leds/net5big-v2:red:power/brightness ]; then
+ echo 255 > /sys/class/leds/net5big-v2:red:power/brightness
+ fi
;;
arm*/orion5x)
# Buffalo devices
--
1.7.9.5
Reply to: