[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#655437: Confirmed



tags 655437 + confirmed
thanks

I have to confirm this. This (the problem reported by Martin) is particularly confusing when several flavours are possible. On a x86-64 system, I get this:

Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-686-pae usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686 486 Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-486 usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686 486 Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686 486 Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-3.2.0-2-486 usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686 486 Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: Found kernels 'linux-image-3.2.0-2-486,linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae,linux-image-486,linux-image-686-pae' Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel candidates: linux-image-3.2-686-pae linux-image-3.2-686-bigmem linux-image-3.2-amd64 linux-image-3.2-686 linux-image-3.2-486 Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-3.2-686-pae (absent) Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-3.2-686-bigmem (absent) Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-3.2-amd64 (absent) Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-3.2-686 (absent) Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: arch_kernel: linux-image-3.2-486 (absent)

This needs to be fixed for wheezy. However, since the choices presented to the user are sorted alphabetically, the current situation must cause a greater usage of the 486 image on i386, which works around #650819. It may be wise to wait for #650819 to be fixed before uploading a fix for this one.



Reply to: