[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cdebconf 0.159

Regis Boudin wrote:
> >Perhaps it's time to get some wide testing? This could be done by
> >temporarily making debconf default DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1
> Sounds like an idea. the various scripts will probably need an
> additional
> check for cdbconf's existence, though, since it caused me trouble

I was assuming we'd make debconf depend on it, although this would
technically violate its Priority value. For temporary testing it seems

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: