Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2011 15:13:59 +0400 with message-id <4DC3D7F7.6040505@msgid.tls.msk.ru> and subject line Re: Bug#113567: busybox-static: busybox as login shell and ash has caused the Debian Bug report #113567, regarding busybox-static: busybox as login shell and ash to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 113567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=113567 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: busybox-static: busybox as login shell and ash
- From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 01:54:26 -0700
- Message-id: <20010926015426.A4794@bluecherry.net>
Package: busybox-static Version: 1:0.60.1-2 Severity: wishlist If you want to have busybox as your root login shell (its shell has been far better than sash for some time now), you can simply make a symlink to it from either sh or ash. Clearly busybox would make a dumb choice for the former, and I have the latter installed already. Please add another shell alias to busybox, maybe "busysh" or something? That'd make it play nicely with ash and still make it able to be root's login shell. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux galen 2.4.8-ac8 #1 Tue Aug 21 06:45:59 PDT 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Free software developer 2.3.1 has been released. Folks new to this game should remember that 2.3.* releases are development kernels, with no guarantees that they will not cause your system to do horrible things like corrupt its disks, catch fire, or start running Mindcraft benchmarks. -- SlashdotAttachment: pgpyZHoQEZiHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>, 113567-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#113567: busybox-static: busybox as login shell and ash
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 15:13:59 +0400
- Message-id: <4DC3D7F7.6040505@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
- In-reply-to: <20010926015426.A4794@bluecherry.net>
- References: <20010926015426.A4794@bluecherry.net>
Version: 1:1.17.1-8 [Replying to a bug which is about 10 years old...] 26.09.2001 12:54, Joseph Carter wrote: > Package: busybox-static > Version: 1:0.60.1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > If you want to have busybox as your root login shell (its shell has been > far better than sash for some time now), you can simply make a symlink to > it from either sh or ash. Clearly busybox would make a dumb choice for > the former, and I have the latter installed already. > > Please add another shell alias to busybox, maybe "busysh" or something? > That'd make it play nicely with ash and still make it able to be root's > login shell. Several Debian revisions back (in lenny? etch?), ash package has been replaced with dash. There's still a compatibility/ transitional package "ash", wich provides /bin/ash symlink to dash, but it's obviously optional. So I think this bugreport is not relevant anymore, so closing it finally, after about 10 years since original bugreport. Thanks! /mjt
--- End Message ---