[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#279118: marked as done (lvm not working on powerpc)



Your message dated Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:56:25 +0100
with message-id <201104070056.25625.elmig@debianpt.org>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #279118,
regarding lvm not working on powerpc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
279118: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=279118
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Version: pre-rc2 / 20041030 for PPC

I'm trying to install Debian on an Apple Xserve.

I want to set it up using LVM. I have to use 'target disk mode' feature
of my powerbook to install Debian on the harddrive of the Xserve. It
shows up as a firewire/scsi drive. 

In the partition editor, I clear the drives partition table.

Then select LVM Configuration, confirm the dialog that theres changes
been made. 

However there is no way to create physical volumes (PVs). There doesn't
seem to be a way to create a partition that is type "Linux LVM".

Please look into this.

Thanks,
Naveen Nathan


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for your report.
Closing as it's an installation report from a debian installer version
which isn't supported anymore.
Feel free to test and report any issues against the current debian
installer release (Squeeze) or the daily images which supports more hardware and also
it's improved.
Thanks!

http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: