[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#269077: marked as done (FWD: rootskel: serial console detection is broken)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:05:43 +1100
with message-id <20110108040543.GX2766@hezmatt.org>
and subject line Closing as requested
has caused the Debian Bug report #269077,
regarding FWD: rootskel: serial console detection is broken
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
269077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=269077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: rootskel
Version: 0.90
Tags: d-i

----- Forwarded message from Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net> -----

From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:51:58 -0500
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: rootskel: serial console detection is broken
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

It looks like rootskel's new serial console detection is broken, at
least for 2.2 kernels on m68k/mac.

The real problem is that /lib/debian-installer/detect-console, 
called from /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S30term, defines

	`readlink /proc/self/fd/0` = /dev/console

as a serial console and that is precisely what is detected during a
non-serial install.

I don't know what that code should be because I can't currently do
serial installs.

Please help.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>



----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
When the last message, asking "should this be closed?", is from over six
years ago, with no negative response, I'm thinking it can be closed.

- Matt

--- End Message ---
Reply to: