[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608828: installation-guide: Users need direction to the functionality they expect



On 01/03/2011 04:43:43 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 04:27:46 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 01/03/2011 02:31:51 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Quoting Karl O. Pinc (kop@meme.com):
> > > 
> > > > Many users expect that their system have software that's
> > > > not in the stock Debian stable repos.
> 
> > > 
> > > So, indeed, thanks in advance for the upcoming patch you will 
> > > propose.
> > 
> > My inclination is to add minimal text which contains a link
> > to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSoftware.  (Which has only
> > an Italian translation at the moment.)
> > 
> > Something like:
> > Chapter 8. Next Steps and Where to Go From Here
> > ...
> > 8.3. Orienting Yourself to Debian
> > ...
> > 8.3.1. Debian Packaging System
> > ... (all existing content)
> > -----------<snip>----------
> > 
> > 8.3.1.1 Additional Software Available for Debian
> 
> Would it be better to keep it only 3 levels of section
> deep so that it shows up in the table of contents?
> (Make it 8.3.2?)

Attached is a patch (with a new section at level 3 (8.3.2)).

cd trunk/manual/en/post-install; patch < orientation.xml.repos.patch

Please let me know if you think another approach would be better.

Regards,

Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein

Title: Additional Software Available for &debian;
--- orientation.xml 2011-01-03 20:13:53.000000000 -0600 +++ orientation.xml.new 2011-01-03 20:25:41.000000000 -0600 @@ -67,6 +67,19 @@ + + + +There are official and unofficial software repositories that are not +enabled in the default &debian; install. These contain software which +many find important and expect to have. Information on these +additional repositories can be found on the &debian; Wiki page titled +The Software +Available for &debian;'s Stable Release. + + + + Application Version Management
Reply to: