Hello, I'm in the process of migrating cryptsetup packages to a dynamically linked binary, which uses the shared libcryptsetup1 library. In order to do so, the libgpg-error0 and libgcrypt11 libraries need to move to /lib first, as libcryptsetup1 links against them. Additionally, libgpg-error0-udeb and libgcrypt11-udeb packages are required in order to satisfy the dependencies for the cryptsetup-udeb package. but now that most of the above issues have been solved by uploads of libgcrypt11 and libgpg-error to experimental, I wonder whether the split of cryptsetup binary and libcryptseup1 library packages should be continued in the udeb packages or not. in other words: shall I add a libcryptsetup1-udeb package and make the cryptsetup-udeb package depend on it? or is it better to have only one cryptsetup-udeb package, containing both the dynamically linked binary (cryptsetup) and the shared library (libcryptsetup1)? I guess that the relavant point is rather: will any d-i component use libcryptsetup1 without the need for the cryptsetup binary anytime soon? I know that systemd developers intend to use libcryptsetup1. greetings, jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature